May 24, 20188 yr 16 hours ago, Lord Pityme said: Logic would point to it being true as it will have been based on 6-12 months of basic Salary. So if Ross was on at his third pay rise £50 - £100k then its probably six months worth of that.... in reality, what manager feeling he is/will be in demand would agree a compo clause for several times annual basic? It would put off suitors, and wouldnt be a realistic level of compo against the cost of replacing someone on the same wages. T.I.S. This Is St Mirren, we are well known as a club to get a goid deal out of for transfers etc... I think it's either that or someone has been spinning lies about a new contract in February. Nothing offical came from the club.
May 24, 20188 yr Author 27 minutes ago, bazil85 said: I think it's either that or someone has been spinning lies about a new contract in February. Nothing offical came from the club. There was an improved contract in February, but it will have been extra wages and pro rata compo clause.
May 24, 20188 yr 18 hours ago, elvis said: So u tell me why would they except £50.000 when £300.000 was agreed with Ipswich Because he won't sign for Ipswich. You do realise that by using a full stop rather than a comma your figures read fifty pounds and 300 pounds? Edited May 24, 20188 yr by beyond our ken
May 24, 20188 yr 6 minutes ago, beyond our ken said: Because he won't sign for Ipswich. You do realise that by using a full stop rather than a comma your figures read fifty pounds and 300 pounds? f**k off.
May 24, 20188 yr 24 minutes ago, Lord Pityme said: There was an improved contract in February, but it will have been extra wages and pro rata compo clause. Tony has came out and said no contract was signed in February apparently.
May 24, 20188 yr Author 10 minutes ago, bazil85 said: Tony has came out and said no contract was signed in February apparently. You dont have to sign an improvement i.e. Higher wages, and given the level of compo it probably backs up there wasnt a complete new contract offered/accepted. if our board had any brains they would have offered a new contract, agreed Ross's compo clause, but insisted on their new clause if he whores himself around whilst on holiday again the compo fee is trebled! C'mon a bit of light in the shade lol.
May 24, 20188 yr 1 hour ago, Lord Pityme said: You dont have to sign an improvement i.e. Higher wages, and given the level of compo it probably backs up there wasnt a complete new contract offered/accepted. if our board had any brains they would have offered a new contract, agreed Ross's compo clause, but insisted on their new clause if he whores himself around whilst on holiday again the compo fee is trebled! C'mon a bit of light in the shade lol. You do, in contract law, he would of had to sign to the change in terms. What Jack Ross was making in January was the same as what he was making in March- May. Same goes for the compensation. Would of been great if he signed a new deal that protected us more but I can see his point in not doing it.
May 25, 20188 yr Author Think Jack made a typo at the end of his "Later Losers" leaving statement.... he put SMTID, but surely he meant SMTJ..? St Mirren till July I'm St Mirren till July Howay the lads howay the lads my wage went up times five....
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.